Amid industry-beating growth, Indonesia’s digital banks still lack profitability

According to analysts, digital banks should tap into nontraditional revenue sources, such as business-to-business payroll and payment systems, to manage profitability issues.

Aditya Hadi

Aditya Hadi

The Jakarta Post

2021_07_28_115891_1627461060._large.jpg

Publicly-listed digital bank Bank Jago launched a mobile app on April 15, 2021. PHOTO: THE JAKARTA POST

October 23, 2023

JAKARTA – Indonesian banks booked 8 percent year-on-year growth in loan disbursement in June, according to data from the Financial Services Authority (OJK).

Most of that growth came from banks in the categories KBMI2, KBMI3 and KBMI4, with more than Rp 6 trillion in core capital, while smaller lenders in the KBMI1 capital category only posted 1 percent loan growth during the same period.

Digital banks, meanwhile, which focus on acquiring and serving users through online platforms, outperformed the industry in terms of loan disbursement. Data from ten major digital-focused banks in the country, almost all of which are in the KBMI1 category, show a 22 percent jump in loans from June 2022 to June 2023.

Analysts attribute these lenders’ significant growth to their strategy of providing user-friendly services and operating in external online ecosystems giving them access to large numbers of users. That said, those new lenders still face challenges in achieving or maintaining profitability and may need three years to see more stable financial results, according to those analysts.

M. Amin Nurdin, a senior faculty member at the Indonesian Banking Development Institute (LPPI), explained that category-KBMI1 banks, with less than Rp 6 trillion in capital, were struggling to grow loan disbursement due to a lack of resources.

“[Increasing loans] incurs acquisition costs to build high-quality sales. Getting more customers also incurs costs in the shape of promotional expenses,” Amin told The Jakarta Post on Thursday.

On the other hand, he added, digital banks could acquire users with fewer resources as they focused on the online realm, which made the registration and transaction process easier and helped attract customers.

“They also tap into ecosystems with deep networks, so the growth would be exponential,” Amin said.

Read also: E-wallets require novel use cases as QRIS muscles in: Analysts

Some digital banks, such as Bank Neo Commerce, Superbank and Bank Aladin, still booked net losses in June as a result of high impairment losses on financial and nonfinancial assets as well as significant general and administrative expenses.

A senior research associate at IFG Progress, Ibrahim Kholilul Rohman, said that despite running fewer physical branches than other commercial banks, digital banks still needed huge funds for technology investment.

“They also need a big network effect [of users], so their traditional revenue, such as interest income, could cover the costs,” Ibrahim told the Post on Wednesday.

He suggested that digital banks tap into nontraditional revenue sources, such as business-to-business payroll and payment systems.

However, established top banks in the country will not sit by idly.

“Our research shows that digital innovation in the banking industry tends to only strengthen the performance of big banks rather than smaller ones,” he said.

That is why banking industry analyst Doddy Ariefianto of Binus University warned that while banks innovated and tapped into new ecosystems, digital banks needed to build a moat around themselves to secure their head start.

“For example, if those digital banks already have contracts with major e-commerce players, what if BCA and Bank Mandiri also try to get similar contracts?” Doddy told the Post on Thursday.

LPPI’s Amin opined that digital lenders still needed time to demonstrate the results of their investments.

“We need at least two or three years to see who will survive in the long run,” he said.

Tapping into e-money

According to Amin, one example of digital banks pushing their growth in loans and third-party funds is Bank Jago’s collaboration with e-wallet service GoPay to launch a hybrid fintech bank account called GoPay Tabungan on Wednesday.

GoPay users who transfer their balance into the new service are offered easier payments on all GoTo platforms while benefiting from 2.5 percent interest with no maximum balance or transaction limit, and with funds guaranteed by the Indonesian Deposit Insurance Corporation (LPS). GoTo Group, the parent company of GoPay, is one of the shareholders of Bank Jago.

“Let say there are 20 million Gopay users in Indonesia, and 30 percent of them convert their balance into GoPay Tabungan. That would result in exponential growth,” Amin said.

Read also: BCA credit issuance up 12.3 percent as of September

BMI Research, a unit of Fitch Group, pointed out that the move showed that conventional commercial banks would reinvent their roles in the digital payments space to stay relevant.

“Going forward, we expect to see more Indonesian commercial banks partnering with key e-money players such as OVO and Dana to stay competitive,” the think tank said in a release on Thursday, referring to the e-wallet services run by PT Visionet Internasional and PT Espay Debit Indonesia Koe, respectively.

“That being said, we believe that following a wave of consolidation [by] players in this space, focus may turn to the critical profitability issues.”

According to the firm, profitability issues are increasingly common in the fintech industry in emerging markets like Indonesia’s. The researchers pointed out that players in other countries, such as GCash in the Philippines, were exploring plans to monetize their core services.

“We do not exclude the possibility that GoTo may begin to follow the same trajectory, as strategic user monetization may hold more risks to the upside. Namely, GoTo could leverage its reputation, financial services portfolio and accessibility to test user reception toward higher fees,” BMI Research concluded.

scroll to top